Word Problems in Math

From IAE-Pedia

Contents 1 Introduction 2 Measuring Progress in Improving Math Education 2.1 Learning Facts and Learning to Think & Solve Problems 2.2 Math Maturity 3 Math Problems and Math Problem Solving 3.1 What is a Problem? 3.2 What is Problem Solving? 3.3 Polya's 6-Step Strategy for Problem Solving 4 Word Problems 4.1 Natural Language 4.2 Problems Expressed in Natural Language 4.3 An Example from Problem Solving in Art 4.4 Six-Step Process in Solving A Math Word Problem 5 Teaching About and Using Word Problems 6 Challenges of Word Problems 7 Synergy: Two for the Price of One 7.1 Abstract Versus Concrete Word Problems 7.2 Pure and Applied Mathematics 7.3 Math Word Problems That Include Non-Math Content 7.4 Value Laden Word Problems 7.5 Reading and Writing Across the Curriculum 8 Word Problems and Computational Thinking 9 Characteristics of Good Word Problems 10 Analysis of Some Word Problems 10.1 Counting Barnyard Animals 10.2 Hamburgers as a Unit of Measure 10.3 Carbon Footprint 11 Recommendations to Teachers of Math 11.1 Improving Math Education 11.2 What You, Individually Can Do 12 References 13 Author or Authors

Progress in developing and writing this document has reached a stage that the content is worth communicating to preservice and inservice teachers, and to teachers of teachers. Indeed, even without any advertising of this site, it has begun to get quite a few hits.

However, the document is not yet complete. Readers are encouraged to communicate their suggestions and ideas in the Discussion page that accompanies this document. (See the Discussion button in the menu near the top of this page.)

The original authors of this document are Robert Albrecht and David Moursund.

To see a large number of Albrecht's writings, go to www.curriki.org and use these search keys:

albrecht game

albrecht number

albrecht investigation

albrecht L&L

See also: Hurkle.

To see a large number of Moursund's writings, go to:

http://iae-pedia.org/IAE_Newsletter

http://iae-pedia.org/Math_Education_Digital_Filing_Cabinet

http://iae-pedia.org/David_Moursund_Editorials

http://iae-pedia.org/David_Moursund_Books

Readers who enjoy this document about Math Word Problems may also enjoy:

Math Maturity.

Problem Solving.

Critical Thinking.

Education for Increasing Expertise.

Introduction

Word problems or "story" problems are a well established component of the math education curriculum. Indeed, some students and math teachers tend to equate "word problem" with "problem" when talking about problem solving in math. Moreover, many people seem to think that math is the only part of the school curriculum that teaches problem solving.

However, problems and problem solving are part of every academic discipline. Each discipline develops some special vocabulary, symbols, and methods for representing and communicating its problems. Each academic discipline develops methods for accumulating and storing information. Each discipline develops methodologies—educators call it content pedagogical knowledge—useful in helping students learn the discipline.

This document focuses on word problems in math. However, word problems are part of every academic discipline. Thus, the intended audience is not only teachers of math, but also teachers in other disciplines. Moreover, there is considerable emphasis on transfer of learning across disciplines.

Food for thought: From time to time this document contains a short, indented section such as this one here. If the materials in this document are being used in a workshop or in a course that includes class discussions, these indented sections might be useful discussion topics. They can also be used for reflection and self assessment.

You are familiar with the idea of "reading across the curriculum." This reading education goal can be stated as a problem: "We want students to learn to read, and we want students to read to learn." Thus, we want students to learn to read in various curriculum areas (such as math and science) well enough so that they can read to learn in these curriculum areas.

It is the authors' observation that relatively few precollege students learn to read math well enough so they can learn math by reading math books, Website, and other similar resources. To a very large extent, math is taught by "oral tradition" methods.

With this in mind, think about possible roles of math word problems in helping student learn to read math. One measure of the quality of a math word problem is its contribution to a student making progress in learn to read math well enough to being able to read to learn math.

Here are some other observations from the authors that motivated the writing of this document:

1. Math textbooks series typically include a major emphasis on word problems. This emphasis is part of the overall emphasis on math problem solving.
2. On average, students dislike math word problems and are not very good at solving them. Many student grow to hate this part of the curriculum.
3. Many teachers and a variety of books and Websites teach specifically on how to identify and solve specific types of math word problems. Often this is done in a mode that might be called "teaching to the test" or "having students learn by rote memory with little understanding."
4. A high percentage of word problems used in math teaching and learning are "contrived," of little interest to students, and are not designed to help students learn to deal world "real world" problems. Students do not tend to be intrinsically motivated by such problems. Typically word problems do not draw on student knowledge and understand of the "real world" and do not require students to do research (for example, research using the Web) to obtain information relevant to solving the problem.(See the next item in this list.)
5. Problem solving requires a combination of domain specific knowledge and skills, and domain independent knowledge and skills. Math word problems are often designed so they make very little use of domain specific knowledge and skills from domains outside of math. Thus, students solving such problems cannot learn to develop and make use of this non-math domain-specific knowledge and skill. This topic or issue falls into the category of transfer of learning. Many students are quite weak at transferring math knowledge and skills to the task of solving math-related problems in non-math disciplines.
6. Solving math word problems requires developing math models of problem situations. Thus, word problems are an excellent environment for teaching math modeling and computational thinking. Currently this aspect of word problems in math education is very under emphasized in the math curriculum.
7. While word problems are a very good vehicle for helping students to increase in math maturity, typically they are not taught or used in such a manner.

This document explores the various issues in the above list. It seeks to identify characteristics of "good" math word problems and accompanying teaching practices that will contribute to improving our math education system.

There is special emphasis on improving math maturity, improving transfer of learning, and computational thinking involving math and computer modeling.

Measuring Progress in Improving Math Education

You are familiar with the quotation, "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." There are widely varying opinions as to what constitutes a good math education system of instruction and learning.

For example, math is a broad, deep, and quite old field of study. Math is thoroughly ingrained into our language and culture. What should students be learning about the history of math and math as part of the various human cultures?

Mathematicians talk about the beauty of math. A proof or a problem solving technique might well be described as being beautiful. What should students be learning about the beauty of math?

Math is an important aid to representing and helping to solve problems in non-math disciplines. What should math teachers know and what should students learn about roles of math in representing and helping to solve problems in non-math disciplines?

Math is a huge discipline, with great breadth and depth. It is a vibrant, growing discipline. The discipline of math is being strongly impacted by the disciplines of Computer Science and Information and Communication Technology.

Thus a K-12 math curriculum—indeed, a math curriculum extending through a doctorate in math—can cover only a small percentage of the discipline. What math content knowledge and math pedagogical content knowledge should be built into the K-12 math curriculum?

Food for thought: You may wonder about the idea of math content pedagogical knowledge being built into the curriculum. Each of us is a teacher, helping ourselves to learn and helping others to learn. Parents and other caregivers of children play a major role in the math education of children. They teach the way they were taught. We can improve math education by helping children learn good ways to teach and learn math.

Learning Facts and Learning to Think & Solve Problems

Here is an overly simplistic summary of the goals in math education. A similar simplistic view can be taken for any other content area being taught in schools:

1. Learn some math facts (data, information, knowledge).
2. Learn to think and solve math problems both in math and in disciplines that make use of math.

People developing the math curriculum have given careful thought as to appropriate scope and sequence for #1. Different textbook series present some differences in both scope and sequence. Sometimes changes are made based on research and on increased insights into what works and what the various stakeholders believe students should be learning. Standards (school district, state, professional society) play a major role in #1.

Once the scope and sequence is agreed on, books can be developed, curriculum can be developed, teachers can be trained, and assessment instruments can be developed. The whole "bundle" represented by #1 lends itself to a factory model of education. It lends itself to setting standards and to measuring how well individual students or groups of students do compared to these standards and/or compared to other students and groups of students.

Item #2 in the list is quite different. Students vary considerably in both the nature and nurture components of their math intelligence and overall intelligence. They vary considerably in their overall cognitive development and their math cognitive development. They also vary considerably in their interests in math and other areas (think in terms of intrinsic motivation).

Item #2 has led many people to think about student-centric and highly individualized education. While the factory model of math education in #1 lends itself to multiple choice assessment questions, #2 requires a different approach to assessment. It requires use of open ended questions in which students attack novel problems and demonstrate their thinking and overall problem-solving knowledge and skills.

Math Maturity

Mathematicians use mathematical maturity to mean, loosely, a mixture of mathematical experience and insight that are not taught directly, but which grow and ripen from substantial exposure to challenging mathematical concepts and processes.

Here is a list of some components of math maturity that relate to and/or can be increased through the study and use of math word problems.

• Learn to learn math; complete the significant shift from learning by (rote) memorization to learning through understanding. Learn to learn math from a variety of aids such as teacher instruction, communication with other people, print materials, the Web, videos, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Distance Education, introspection and reflection, and so on.

• Learn to communicate mathematics and math ideas orally and in writing using standard notation, vocabulary, and acceptable style.

• Learn to represent (model) verbal and written problem situations as mathematical problems.

• Learn to transfer one’s math knowledge and skills to address novel (not previously encountered) both to math problems and to math-related problems in other disciplines.

• Develop and use mathematical "sense" and intuition that allows one to detect errors in math problem solving and in use of math.

• Recognize a valid mathematical or logical argument, and detect "sloppy" thinking. Provide solid evidence (informal and formal arguments and proofs) of the correctness of one’s efforts in solving math problems.

• Have persistence when faced by a challenging problem. Learn to make use of challenging problems as a vehicle for increasing you math math problem-solving skills. A key aspect of this is metacognition and reflection.

The term math maturity is useful in talking about goals of math education and a student's level of progress in learning math. People want a math education system that leads to increasing math maturity for students. We recognize that because students vary so much in intelligence, cognitive development, and interests, students will gain in math maturity at different rates. The final level of math maturity that various students reach will vary considerably

A "good" math word problem serves as a good vehicle or environment contributing to a student's progress gaining an increased level of math maturity.

Math Problems and Math Problem Solving

George Polya was a 20th century mathematician and math educator leader. He wrote wrote extensively about math problem solving. The following is quoted from a talk that he gave to a group of elementary school teachers:

“To understand mathematics means to be able to do mathematics. And what does it mean doing mathematics? In the first place it means to be able to solve mathematical problems. For the higher aims about which I am now talking are some general tactics of problems—to have the right attitude for problems and to be able to attack all kinds of problems, not only very simple problems, which can be solved with the skills of the primary school, but more complicated problems of engineering, physics and so on, which will be further developed in the high school. But the foundations should be started in the primary school. And so I think an essential point in the primary school is to introduce the children to the tactics of problem solving. Not to solve this or that kind of problem, not to make just long divisions or some such thing, but to develop a general attitude for the solution of problems.” ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Pólya George Polya; 1887–1985.)

What is a Problem?

Each academic discipline includes an emphasis on representing ans solving problems. It is a challenge to write a definition of "problem" that cuts across all disciplines. Here is a definition of problem that fits reasonably well in many different disciplines.

You (personally) have a problem if the following four conditions are satisfied:

1. You have a clearly defined given initial situation.
2. You have a clearly defined goal (a desired end situation). Some writers talk about having multiple goals in a problem. However, such a multiple goal situation can be broken down into a number of single-goal problems.
3. You have a clearly defined set of resources that may be applicable in helping you move from the given initial situation to the desired goal situation. These typically include some of your time, knowledge, skills, and brain power. Resources might include money, the Web, and the telecommunication system. There may be specified limitations on resources, such as rules, regulations, guidelines, and time lines for what you are allowed to do in attempting to solve a particular problem.
4. You have some ownership—you are committed to using some of your own resources, such as your knowledge, skills, time, and energy, to achieve the desired final goal.

The "resources" in the third part of the definition, do not tell you how to solve a problem. Rather, they are used as aids to problem solving. In many problem-solving situations, Information and Communication Technology (including the Internet, Web, calculators, and computers) and computerized tools are resources. These resources have grown more powerful over the years. That is one reason why it is becoming more and more common to integrate the use of computers in problem solving thoroughly into the basic fabric of academic courses.

The fourth part of the definition of a problem is particularly important. Unless you have ownership—through an appropriate combination of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation—you do not have a problem. Motivation, especially intrinsic motivation, is a huge topic in its own right, and I will not attempt to explore it in detail in this book. Edward Vockell maintains an online book, Educational Psychology: A Practical Workbook. The fifth chapter provides a nice discussion of motivation.

Food for thought: Many students find they have little or no personal interest—little intrinsic motivation, little ownership—in the types of math problems that they encounter in school. Thus teachers, parents, grading systems, and other extrinsic motivation factors are used to motivate and/or coerce students into learning math.

This is not a good situation. Of course, other academic disciplines also have to deal with this challenge. However, perhaps the challenge is more severe in math education than in most other disciplines. Starting at about the fourth grade, students must deal with a great deal of delayed gratification. They are steered through a curriculum that prepares them for the next year's curriculum that prepares them for the next year's curriculum. They eventually are steered through algebra, geometry, and more algebra. Most of the content they are learning is not immediately useful or used in their everyday lives or in the other courses they are taking.

What is Problem Solving?

This document considers problem solving to include:

• Question situations: recognizing, posing, clarifying, and answering questions.
• Problem situations: recognizing, posing, clarifying, and then solving problems.
• Task situations: recognizing, posing, clarifying, and accomplishing tasks.
• Decision situations: recognizing, posing, clarifying, and making good decisions.
• Using higher-order critical, creative, wise, and foresightful thinking to do all of the above. Often the results are shared, demonstrated, or used as a product, performance, or presentation.

Polya's 6-Step Strategy for Problem Solving

A strategy is a general plan. A company may have a strategy for increasing sales and profits. A military commander may have a strategy for an upcoming battle. A school district may have a strategy for improving the state and national test scores of its students.

Here is a strategy useful in attacking a wide range of math and non-math problems. Break the problem into two or more smaller, more manageable problems. Solve smaller, more manageable problems and then assemble the results into a solution to the original problem. This strategy is often called, "Divide and conquer." Another useful strategy is called, "Guess and check" or "Trial and error." There are a great many different strategies that are useful in math problem solving and in solving problems in other disciplines.

Math education research suggests that a typical student has a very small repertoire of math problem-solving strategies. Thus, helping a student to learn a new strategy and to develop fluency in its use can be a quite worthy math education goal.

Even more important is helping students learn to make use of their problem-solving strategies over a wide rage of problems from a wide range of disciplines. That is exactly what the High Road Theory of transfer of learning is about.

George Polya (1887-1985) was a great mathematician and teacher who wrote extensively about problem solving. Polya's 6-step problem-solving strategy is useful in math and in most other disciplines. The following version of this strategy has been modified to be applicable in many problem-solving domains. All students can benefit from learning and understanding this strategy and practicing its use for a wide range of problems.

1. Understand the problem. Among other things, this includes working toward having a clearly defined problem. You need an initial understanding of the Givens, Resources, and Goal. This requires knowledge of the domain(s) of the problem, which could well be interdisciplinary.

2. Determine a plan of action. This is a thinking activity. What strategies will you apply? What resources will you use, how will you use them, in what order will you use them? Are the resources adequate to the task?

3. Think carefully about possible consequences of carrying out your plan of action. Place major emphasis on trying to anticipate undesirable outcomes. What new problems will be created? You may decide to stop working on the problem or return to step 1 because of this thinking.

4. Carry out your plan of action in a reflective, thoughtful manner. This thinking may lead you to the conclusion that you need to return to one of the earlier steps. Note that reflective thinking leads to increased expertise.

5. Check to see if the desired goal has been achieved by carrying out your plan of action. Then do one of the following:

a. If the problem has been solved, go to step 6.

b. If the problem has not been solved and you are willing to devote more time and energy to it, make use of the knowledge and experience you have gained as you return to step 1 or step 2.

c. Make a decision to stop working on the problem. This might be a temporary or a permanent decision. Keep in mind that the problem you are working on may not be solvable, or it may be beyond your current capabilities and resources.

6. Do a careful analysis of the steps you have carried out and the results you have achieved to see if you have created new, additional problems that need to be addressed. Reflect on what you have learned by solving the problem. Think about how your increased knowledge and skills can be used in other problem-solving situations. Work to increase your reflective intelligence!

Polya's 6-step strategy can be used in attacking a word problem. Thus, this section provides us with two possible characteristics of a good word problem:

1. It helps a student learn and gain practice in using Polya's 6-step strategy.
2. It helps students learn and/or practice a strategy that lends itself to High Road transfer of learning.

Word Problems

In this document, the term "word problem" is taken to mean any problem that can be communicated via oral language, sign language, written language, gestures, drawings and paintings, video and audio recordings, and so on.

Each academic discipline has developed aids to communicating the problems in the discipline and in representing and storing accumulated knowledge about how to "attack" and possibly solve problems. Each academic discipline has some discipline-specific ways of teaching—some pedagogical content knowledge. In some sense, one goal of education in a particular discipline is to help students learn the culture of the discipline.

Natural Language

The natural languages that humans use to communicate with each other contain many words that are used to communicate math ideas. Thus, we have number words such as one, two, three, and we have "abstract" symbols for numbers such as 1, 2, and 3. We have words such as plus, minus, times, and equals, and we have abstract symbols +, -, x, and =.

A language word often has several means, while a math symbol typically has be very precisely given single meaning. Thus, when we say, "All men are created equal." the word "equal" does not have the same meaning as the math symbol =. One of the challenges in learning math is to learn to effectively deal with and communicate precisely using the words and symbols of math.

We use number words and numbers in representing and dealing with age, time, distance, length, area, volume, money, and so on. In all of these situations, the number words are accompanied with some unit of measure. A student is 14 years old. A grocery store item costs $5.28. Carpet is sold by the square yard—and a certain amount of money per square yard. Distance is measures in units such as cm or inch, meter or yard, kilometer or mile, and so on.

In natural language, we often make use of somewhat confusing and quite approximate measures. When asked, "How far is it from Eugene, Oregon to to Portland, Oregon?" a person might respond, "About two hours." The answer is a driving time for traveling to Portland by car. However, if two bicyclists were talking, the answer given might be seven hours.

Problems Expressed in Natural Language

We make extensive use of math and math-related ideas and vocabulary as we represent and attempt to solve many different types of problems. Think of a math word problem being a problem expressed in oral or written language that makes use of the types of math and math-related words in our natural languages. From that point of view, math word problems are a routine part of our everyday lives.

Math is a huge and steadily growing discipline. There is a huge accumulation of mathematical knowledge and skills. Much of this is represented in (communicated in) the "language" of mathematics.

From this point of view, the purpose of having word problems in the math curriculum is two-fold:

1. To help students learn to translate problems that are expressed in oral or written natural language into problems that can draw on the accumulated math and skills knowledge of the problem solver and the accumulated math knowledge available from other people or in physical and virtual libraries.
2. To help students gain in their ability to more precisely use natural language to represent math-related problems and results from solving math problems.

An Example from Problem Solving in Art

Each discipline has its own accumulation of problems, ways of thinking about problems, and ways to solve problems. The University of Oregon has recently completed construction of a new College of Education building. This building contains some art of various kinds.The following is quoted from an email message sent to the faculty on 10/9/09:

Unity and Harmony: An Environmental Artwork

This weekend, the final pieces of public art will be installed in the College of Education complex. Five sculptures will be installed: one in front of the clinical services building, one on the grass leading to the plaza, and three on Kendall Plaza. This work is site-specific, designed for the College of Education.

The artist is Yuki Nagase. Masayuki Nagase began his career at the Academy of Fine Arts in Tokyo. In 1995, he became a U.S. resident and established a studio in Berkeley, CA.

Comments from the artist on the concept prior to starting the project:

“Upon my site visit, it was clear that the vision for the new College of Education complex would physically and symbolically re-connect the existing buildings that were scattered around the campus. My design concept comes from that vision to unify and to harmonize the diverse separate facilities into an inter-related whole.

"Key issues I wanted to address in this concept:

1) Work with natural materials and natural imagery

2) Provide functional seating

3) Provide interaction with children visiting the complex

4) Offer a symbolic focal point for the complex

"The artwork is an environmental work that visually and physically travels from [the clinical services building] through the plaza. It represents the concept of “Unity and Harmony”.

"The a free-standing sculptural composition placed on the stretch of lawn …is composed of 3 elements carved out of one massive granite boulder. This sculptural composition is a metaphorical expression of a cycle of life. The main image that I envision is an abstract form of the universal concept of Heaven and Earth, in the Asian traditions of Yin and Yang.

"The benches in the plaza would be made from large natural granite boulders with the top surfaces hand carved and partially polished. The relief carvings would reflect the images of the 4 major elements found in nature: Water, Fire, Wind and Mountain.

"As one enters the plaza for the [new College of Education] HEDCO building, the visitor will see the sculptural benches. They will provide a strong tactile and interactive experience as well as on a visual level. Beyond them on the lawn, the visitor will see the vertical freestanding sculpture from the plaza and as one travels on the walkway. The forms of the sculpture are visually and tactilely inviting to children. They can spontaneously interact with the natural boulders by climbing, sliding, and touching, providing a spontaneous play experience with natural materials”.

The artist uses words to describe the problem and goals. However, these words do not communicate the same thing to each reader. Indeed, it takes considerable knowledge of the discipline of art to understand the problem being addressed, the specific goals, and the resources (materials, the artists time and skills) available.

Notice also that there are many possible solutions to the original problem faced by the artist. If presented with the same problem sometime in the future, the artist would quite likely produce a quite different solution.

Finally, think about the types of math involved in solving the problem. There are spatial problems, size and shape of seating problems, and so on. The artist like build a scale model and/or did careful scale drawing How does the math a student learns in school relate to the math the artist used in addressing his problem?

Six-Step Process in Solving A Math Word Problem

Here is another way of representing Polya's 6-step strategy. Think about the six steps illustrated in the following diagram:

1. Most people are not very precise when they start to state a problem. They tend to talk about a problem situation. Step 1 is a process of moving from poorly stated and poorly defined problem situation to a carefully stated and precisely defined problem. Word problems in math books are usually clearly defined. This means that students do not get practice in doing step 1.
2. Step 2 is the process of representing the clearly defined natural language problem as a math problem. The result is expressed in math vocabulary and symbols as a "pure" math problem to be solved.For example, it might be computations to be performed, equations to be solved, data tp be graphed, or so on.
3. Step 3 is the process of solving the 'pure" math problem. This might be done mentally, using pencil and paper, using a calculator, using a computer, or so on. The problem solver may well draw upon information stored in physical or virtual libraries. A computer used to access the Web and/or the computers used by the Web may well be used to carry out needed symbol manipulation and computational activities. The WolframAlpha system provides an excellent example of combining information retrieval with symbol manipulation and computation.
4. Step 4 takes the results from solving the "pure" math problem and translates them back into natural language.
5. Step 5 checks to see if the clearly defined math problem has been solved.
6. Step 6 checks to see if the original problem situation has been resolved.

In very rough summary, steps 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 require careful, thoughtful human thinking and understanding.

Step 3 might be carried out by some combination of mental math, paper and pencil math, use of simple tools such as ruler, compass, protractor, and calculator, and use of more sophisticated tools such as computers and computerized instruments.

Students find word problems to be hard because of the careful, thoughtful, human thinking and understanding that is required and because of the challenges of step 3.

Step 1 is a process of clarifying and understanding a problem situation. In very simple terms, what is the given initial situation and what is the goal? Problem solving is a process of moving from a given initial situation to a desired final (goal) situation.

Step 2 is a process of math and computer modeling. The modeling process produces a math problem, and quite often the problem can be solved by computer. Step 4 is a process of math or computer unmodeling. The process of solving the math problem produces results that need to be translated back into natural language.

A great may of the math-related problem situations that a person encounters in their day to day life can be handled easily and relatively quickly. The six steps blur together and are carried out mentally with little conscious thought. For example, I am talking to a friend on the phone. My friend says, "Let's meet for lunch in the eatery located on the corner of 4th and Jefferson."

My mind processes the problem situation. I glance at my watch, think about what I need to do before I can leave for lunch, think about the time involved in bicycling to 4th and Jefferson, glance outside to see if the weather will slow me down, think about what time it is and what traffic is like at this time, and I say, "All right. I can be there in 30 minutes—does 12:15 work for you?" Notice the complexity of the problem I am solving, the various uses of technology, and the "putting it all together" type of thinking that is required. Think about the high level of intelligence all of this takes. Any person who can handle such a problem is demonstrating a quite high level of intelligence of the type Robert Sternberg calls "street smarts."

Now, back to the 6-step diagram. It is interesting to explore how much of the math education time in schools is spend helping students get better at steps 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 versus how much time is spent on helping students to get better at step 3. Precollege teachers of math tend to estimate that step 3 gets about 75% of the student learning time and effort. Such informal data suggests that perhaps only a quarter of math schooling time is spent on the other five steps that are all quite dependent on human thinking. The one step that calculators, computers, and computerized instruments can do best gets by far the most student schooling time and effort. And, this effort focuses mainly on non-computer approaches to accomplishing this step.

This analysis suggests that word problems are a very important component of math education because they give student instruction and practice in doing the human thinking parts of problem solving. It also suggests that one aspect of a good word problem is that it provides a good environment that provides instruction and practice in human thinking.

Teaching About and Using Word Problems

Word problems can be an important component of a good math curriculum. However, the "goodness" of a particular word problem or set of word problems must be judged in terms of the contribution made to achieving the overall math education goals that guide the curriculum, instruction, and assessment.

Food for thought: Think about a parallel between a Language Arts teacher assigning giving an essay-writing assignment and a Mathematics teacher assigning a set of one or more word problems. In both cases, students are expected to "do" something. In both cases, the student has some knowledge, skills, and experience that can be used for self-assessment of the quality of work being done. In both cases, it is expected that summative assessment feedback (and perhaps formative assessment feedback) will be provided by others, such as other students, paper graders, and teachers.

It requires considerable knowledge and skill to provide good feedback on student writing. Moreover, this is a demanding, time consuming task. The paper reader must read for understanding, have good insight into the writing skills of students at a particular level, and know what constitutes good writing. The reader must have good writing pedagogical knowledge and skills. The reader must be able to effectively deal with the different approaches students take to a particular writing task, and the major differences in content that different students will produce.

Similar statements hold for providing feedback on student work in solving math word problems. It requires quite good content knowledge and content pedagogical knowledge to provide good feedback on the work students do when solving challenging word problems.

This observation lies at the heart of major contraversies in the math education of elementary school teachers. Math Departments stress the need for teachers to have very good content knowledge, while Colleges of Education stress the need for teachers to have very good pedagogical content knowledge.

Challenges of Word Problems

This section is a work in progress.

The 6-step diagram illustrates the general steps involved in attempting to solve a word problem. The math teaching challenge is to help students gain the knowledge and skill to deal with both commonly occurring and novel word problems.

If there were just a modest number of types of commonly-occurring math word problems, then one might propose that rote memory is the right approach. Beginning in first grade, students memorize a portion of such problems—how to recognize them and how to solve them. Year after year in school a student continues this process, with the goal of mastery of how to solve a very large number of commonly occurring math word problems.

If word problem solving assessment at the school district, state, and national levels is based just on the list of the commonly occurring word problems being studied in the curriculum, then such a rote memory approach to this area of math teaching and learning will lead to students getting high scores on the assessments. Thus, it is not surprising that variations on this approach have been widely used in schooling in the past and are still widely used.

There are many serious flaws in this approach. … … … Work in progress.

Synergy: Two for the Price of One

As noted earlier, each discipline has a focus on identifying, representing, learning about, and solving the types of problems that are consistent with the discipline. It has also been emphasized that math is often quite useful in representing and helping to solve problems in many different disciplines.

Thus, math educators face the following challenge. To what extent should math educators teach "pure" math (where there are few or no referents to disciplines other than math) and to what extent should they teach math with an emphasis on how it is embedded in and used in solving problems in other disciplines?

The "Two for the Price of One" title of this section is based on the idea that well designed math word problems can be used to simultaneously helps studetns make progress in both pure and applied math. Indeed, a well designed math word problem can actually create "Three for the Price of One" learning situations, with studetns learning about and integrating Pure, Applied, and Computational mathematics.

Food for thought: College and University Math Departments often face this challenge by having some faculty and courses focusing on "pure" math, some faculty and courses focusing on "applied" math and statistics, and some faculty and math focusing on "computational" math. That is, the overall discipline of mathematics is often divided into pure, applied, and computational components.

Such dividing up the discipline and specialization of faculty seldom occurs at below the high school level. At the current time there appears to be growing controversy as to whether all high school students should be required to take a relatively pure math collection of courses (algebra 1, geometry, algebra 2) or whether other options should be available.

Abstract Versus Concrete Word Problems

Here are two word problems:

1. I am thinking of a number. If I double the number and then subtract 13, the result is 77. What is the number I am thinking of?

2. If I double how old I am and subtract 13, I get my mother's age. My mother is 77. How old am I?

These are essentially the same problem. The second problem provides referents—people and ages of people. It also allows the problem solver to draw on the external information that a child is younger than his or her mother. This fact can be used as an aid to verifying the possible correctness of a proposed solution to the problem.

In this simple-minded example, the context of "real world" referents is of only modest use. For example, a negative age answer makes no sense, and everybody knows that a child is younger than his or her mother. When math is used to help solve a real world problem, the context of the problem often provides information about the reasonableness of a proposed answer.

Thus, one aspect of a "good" word problem is that it provides context and referents that the problem solver can combine with his or her real world knowledge as an aid to checking the reasonableness of a proposed answer.

It turns out that this is a very important idea in math education. Think about using a calculator or, a clerk in a store having to key in the number and/or price for an item that is not in the scanner system). It is very easy to make keying errors. How does one detect keying errors?

An important part of an answer lies in drawing on knowledge about the problem situation. For example, perhaps I am buying some fruit and I remember distinctly that I picked out the cheapest of the various varieties of apples from the various apple bins. I didn't want to spend more than about $4 or $5 for apples. I recall that some apples cost much more than others. I glance at the display being generated as each item is processed by the clerk, and I see that I have bought about $12 worth of apples. No! Surely I didn't buy that many. Something has gone wrong! Perhaps I took the apples from the wrong bin. Perhaps there was a keying error, a scanner error, or a wrong number entered into the computer that is hooked to the scanner. Perhaps an apple from a more expensive bin got into the bin I selected from.

A quite similar situation occurs when I use a calculator to do a calculation. Perhaps I am working on my family budget, on income tax, or on figuring out student grades at the end of a term. It is very easy to make a keying error. But, I have some knowledge about what constitutes reasonable answers. I often catch keying errors (including results from keys that stick, accidentally depression two keys at once, accidentally depressing a key twice when I don't mean to, and so on). If I am mentally alert while doing the calculations, I will detect an "A" student suddenly becomes a "C" students or when I unexpectedly seem to owe the IRS a lot of extra money. Of course, it is possible that my calculations are correct. But surely, I need to do them over again to help make sure I have not made a keying error.

Pure and Applied Mathematics

The "pure" versus "applied" math issue is evident in all precollege math curriculum. Some math books place much more emphasis on one side or the other. Some teachers are much more skilled at teaching a "blend" than others. Some students thoroughly enjoy learning math from a rather abstract, theoretical point of view, while others like the math they learn to be thoroughly grounded in practical, immediately useful ideas and applications.

Consider the math education challenge created by the second group of students. Each has their own individual knowledge, skills, experiences, and interests. If each such student had a highly qualified personal tutor, the tutor could individualize the instruction and work one-on-one with the student to personalize the math topics being covered.

However, even the very best of current Highly Interactive Intelligent Computer-Assisted Learning systems lack the breadth, depth, and knowledge to provide this quality of instruction.

Thus, individual studetns are left with the challenges of generalization and transfer of learning of the math they are being taught.

This pure versus applied and transfer of learning situations suggests that math education can be made more successful by a four-pronged approach:

1. The precollege math curriculum becoming more balanced among pure, applied, and computational math.
2. The precollege math curriculum placing greater emphasis on teaching for transfer of learning to problem solving in other disciplines.
3. The precollege teachers in other disciplines placing a greater emphasis on problem solving ad using math to help represent and solve these problems.
4. Students being given considerable instruction about and practice in transfer of learning.

Math teachers at the precollege level can make use of appropriately chosen word problems and teaching methodology to help accomplish their part of the four-pronged approach.

Math Word Problems That Include Non-Math Content

Many of the math word problems one finds in typical math textbooks appear to be somewhat grounded in applications of math. Let's analyze the following math word problem:

Pat earns has an allowance of $8.50 a week and earns $3.75 a week doing extra chores. Pat spends an average of $.95 a day for candy, pop, and snacks, and saves all of the rest of her income. Pat want to buy an electronic game that costs $49.95. How long will it take Pat to save that much money?

Well, you say. What's not "real world" about this? The problem deals with receiving, spending, and saving money. Now, try to imagine a student who has reached an age and educational level appropriate to this problem, who has not already learned about those aspects of money. Thinking about this may lead you to conclude that the math word problem will not help the student to learn anything about applications of math that he or she does not already know.

Now, think more deeply about the problem. Can you think of other somewhat similar problems? Here are a few examples:

1. Consider a person eating to take in calories, using up calories through daily physical and mental activities, and experiencing a net increase or decrease in weight.
2. Consider a highway that experiences substantial wear from traffic, is maintained via minor repairs from time to time, and gradually deteriorates. One can describe similar situations for houses, office buildings, and other structures and infrastructures.
3. Consider the world's known oil supply. It increases through discovery of new oil fields and decreases through use of oil. At current rates of discovery and use, how long will it be before the known oil supply is down to 1/4 of what it currently is?

Perhaps an "Aha!" is in order here. There are lots of different problems that are similar to the problem about Pat having income, spending, and savings. Some may involve negative savings, such as the known oil supply decreasing or a person's weight decreasing.

- - - - This example is a work in progress - - - - The income, outgo, and savings situation lends itself to developing a simple spreadsheet model. This provides an example of computational math from a computational thinking point of view. Spreadsheets making use of simple formulas and variables provide good concrete examples of some importatn aspects in algebra.

Value Laden Word Problems

Consider a word problem in which a child is saving money to buy a relatively expensive and fancy "outfit" versus a problem in which a child is saving money to contribute to providing food and clothes for homeless children.

The necessary thinking and problem solving skills can easily be identical in the two problems. However, one of the problems might be seen as emphasizing a type of conspicuous and selfish type of consumption, while the other might be seen as emphasizing a type of providing help to others less fortunate than oneself.

Thus, while the math being learned is the same in the two cases, the values being emphasized are not. One can look for such synergy in every math word problem.

Think about some of the large problems in our world. You might think about sustainability, war and terrorism, medical problems, homelessness, hunger, irresponsible parents and children, crocked politicians and government officials, and so on. Now think about the context or "story" in a word problem. Can the story be designed to help teach values and points of view that you feel are important. Surely!

Are there values or points of view that we want our schools to help students to learn? Take sustainability as an example. Do you believe that it is important for students to grow up understanding some of the major issues of sustainability, what they individually might do to help address these problem situations, and what they might do in working with others to help address these problem situations?

If you say "yes," then one way to do this is through choice of context and referents in word problems. In essence, the story in a word problem can contain and can draw on real world problem situations and real world data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. The process of attacking such problems helps the student learn about these problem and draw upon his or her knowledge about the problems.

Reading and Writing Across the Curriculum

Reading and writing across the curriculum is a commonly accepted goal of education. Of course, we want studetns to learn to red well enough so that they can read by learning. We want they to learn to write well enough so that they can use writing in the various disciplines they study.

Reading and writing math are a major challenge to many students. We some signs of this in students learning to deal with word problems. They tend to become bogged down in extracting the given information, adding to it information they already know, doing research to gain still more needed information, and then developing a clearly stated math problem. The whole task can be thought of in terms of reading and writing math. A good math word problem helps to increase the math reading and math writing knowledge and skills of students.

Along with learning to do the math reading and math writing necessary in attempting to solve mah word problems, studetns can learn to create math word problems. Think of this in terms of creative writing in the disicline of math. A related writing topic is to keep a math journal that has some portfolio-like characteristics. In the journal reflect on and explore one's math-learning and problem-solving activities.

Word Problems and Computational Thinking

“Computers are incredibly fast, accurate, and stupid. Human beings are incredibly slow, inaccurate, and brilliant. Together they are powerful beyond imagination.” (Albert Einstein; German and American theoretical physicist; 1879–1955.)

Albert Einstein's statement quoted above captures the essence of http://iae-pedia.org/Computational_Thinking computational thinking.] Computational thinking involves using the capabilities of one's (human) brain and the capabilities of computer (brains) to represent and solve problems and accomplish tasks. Education for computational thinking involves learning to make effective use of these two types of brains.

Here is a more recent description of computational thinking:

Computational thinking is a way of solving problems, designing systems, and understanding human behavior that draws on concepts fundamental to computer science. Computational thinking is thinking in terms of abstractions, invariably multiple layers of abstraction at once. Computational thinking is about the automation of these abstractions. The automaton could be an algorithm, a Turing machine, a tangible device, a software system—or the human brain. (Carnegie Mellon, n.d.) [Bold added for emphasis.]

Human brains get better through informal and formal education and through regular use. Computer brains get better through the combined research and development of many thousands of people. Computer brains are getting better at a rapid pace. Thus, all student and all teachers need to learn and teach about the capabilities and limitations of the combination of human and computer brains.

Each type of brain has unique capabilities and limitations. Together they are incredibly powerful. Read more about this idea in the document Two Brains Are Better Than One.

What does this have to do with math word problems? Well, a simple answer is that a math word problem is a problem. Computational thinking is type of thinking used in problem solving.

In problem solving, people draw on the thinking power of their own brains. However, they also draw on:

• The "thinking power" of computer systems.
• The knowledge and skills built into tools and other aids to problem solving that people have developed.
• The accumulated knowledge of the human race that can be accessed from other people, from conventional libraries, and from virtual libraries such as the Web.
• Help from other people. Many problems are attacked by a team of people with differing specializations and problem-solving areas of knowledge and skills.

Thus, when faced by a word problem, a person needs to think about the specific resources he or she can bring to bear, as well as other types of resources such as those listed above.

Because of the steadily increasing power of computer systems and virtual libraries, computational thinking is becoming more and more important. A good problem solver has knowledge and skills to help determine what computer-based tools might prove useful—or even indispensable—in attacking a problem.

As indicated in earlier parts of this document, there are many reasons for using math word problems in the math curriculum. One very importatn reason is that in solving math word problems students gain knowledge and skills in problem solving.

Characteristics of Good Word Problems

This is a work in progress.

Word problems can be an important component of a good math curriculum. However, the "goodness" of a particular word problem or set of word problems must be judged in terms of the contribution made to achieving the overall math education goals that guide the curriculum, instruction, and assessment.

Thus, "Goodness" is dependent on the teacher's knowledge, interests, and skills as well as the students' knowledge, interest, and skills.

Similar statements hold for providing feedback on student work in solving math word problems.

Here is a summary list of possible features of a good math word problem that have been discussed in previous parts of this document.

1. It helps students to learn and/or practice using strategies that are useful both in solving math problems and in solving problems in other disciplines. That is, it facilitates students learning and doing High Road transfer of problem-solving strategies.
2. It helps students get better at math modeling and math unmodeling. (See the 6-step diagram version of Polya's six-step strategy.)
3. It is fun. It has a good chance of being intrinsically motivating to students.
4. It is cognitively challenging. It "pushes" the envelop for students.
5. It serves as a good vehicle or environment contributing to a student's progress gaining an increased level of math maturity.

Other considerations:

1. Learning to draw on the accumulated knowledge of the human race. In real world problem solving, one of the most important ideas is drawing on this collected knowledge.
2. Just in time learning. In real world problem solving, it is often necessary for the problem solver to learn new things in order to solve the problem.

Analysis of Some Word Problems

Any math word problem can be analyzed and discussed from the point of view of ideas in this document.Th

Counting Barnyard Animals

Here is a problem that might look somewhat familiar to you. There are many different variations on this type of problem.

While walking by a farmyard filled with chickens and rabbits, a farmer decided to count the feet of his animals. His count produces a total of 100 feet. How many chickens and how many rabbits does the farmer have?

My first thought is that this is not a very good word problem. What kind of person counts animals by counting their legs? What will I learn about farm animals and farming by solving this problem? Are these free range chickens and rabbits? If so, it seems to me that it would be very difficult to do an accurate count. Also, is not immediately obvious how what I learn by solving this problem will be applicable to other problems that might interest me.

My mind wanders a bit. My veterinarian has a three-legged cat and and I have seen one-legged birds. Perhaps some of the farmer's chickens and rabbits have more or less than the usual compliment of legs? If that is the case, this is a poorly defined problem. Thus, I will proceed by assuming all of the farmer's chickens each have exactly two legs and also that the farmer's rabbits each have exactly four legs.

Next, I think more about the counting task. I imagine it is quite difficult to produce an exact count of legs in a large group of animals. How do I know that 100 is a correct count? Perhaps that there were actually 99 legs or 101 legs?

No—that can not be. The total number of legs must be an even number? Aha! I am drawing on my math knowledge that 2 and 4 are even numbers, that the sum of a bunch of 2s is an even number, that the sum of a bunch of 4s is an even number, and that the sum of two even numbers is an even number. I have figured out that 100 is at least a plausible number for the total of the legs.

However, ignoring these types of questions, I proceed. I work to understand the problem. I create a picture in my mind's eye or perhaps on a piece of paper of a collection of chickens and a collection of rabbits. To get a "feel" for what is going on, I make a guess that perhaps there are 50 chickens and 50 rabbits. Hmm. That would produce a total of 300 legs—far more than the reported 100 legs.

On the other hand, suppose there were five chickens and five rabbits. That would produce a total of 30 legs—far less than the reported 100 legs. Okay, the problem is beginning to make sense to me. There is a challenge.

I am beginning to think that this problem is more intersting than I originally thought. I have convinced myself that the problem is poorly stated. I have convinced myself that I should assume that the farmer was able to an exact count—even though this seems somewhat unlikely. I have used some of my knowledge of even numbers to analyze the overall situation. I have used some mental guess and check to get a feeling for the sizes of numbers that are involved in the problem.

In doing these things, I am displaying some aspects of my math maturity. The mind wandering, thinking, and challenging the problem poser may be by far the most important learning activities going on as I address this problem. That is because they are all aspects of math problem-solving maturity that carry over to other problems.

Finally, I bring my mind back to the task at hand. How about another guess, to keep myself grounded. How about 25 rabbits, which gives me 100 legs. Sounds good to me. But, then there are no chickens. I look back at the original statement of the problem to see if it says that the farmer has both chickens and rabbits. If the farmer has zero chickes and 25 rabbits, would the problem poser say "chickens" and "rabbits?" Hmm. What assumption should I make about this possibly poorly stated aspect of the problem? I first thought is to assume that there are two or more chickens and two or more rabbits.

By now, of course, you have likely solved the problem. I hope that you got more than one correct answer. Many problems have more than one correct answer. It is good to provide students with examples of such problems.

Now, here is another question for you. Can you name any problem that you have ever encountered outside of a math class—either in school or outside of school—that is similar enough to the chickens and rabbits problem so that transfer of learning might occur between the problems? Let me give you a few hints of possibilities. Think about:

1. Problems that were not clearly defined, and in which you had to make assumptions—perhaps based on your knowledge, perhaps based on guesses of the intended meaning—in order to proceed in attempting to solve the problem?
2. Problems in which indirect measurements are used? (Instead of counting or measuring exactly what you want to know, you gather data from which what you want to know can be figured out from the data.
3. Problems with more than one solution?
4. Problems that are easily solved by guess and check?

Hamburgers as a Unit of Measure

Consider the following math math word problems.

Problem 1. How many hamburgers from HFFS (the Hamburger Fast Food Store) would it take to circle the earth at its equator if they are laid down

Problem 2. How many hamburgers from HFFS would it take to reach from the earth of the moon if they were stacked on top of each other.

My first reaction is that these are silly problems. There is a lot of water along the equator, so one would have to deal with soggy, sinking hamburgers. Hamburgers stacked on top of each other will mush downward, flattening the ones nearer the bottom. Moreover, the earth and moon are both moving, so the task seems impossible.

On the other hand, think about a middle school student who comes home from school and is asked, "What did you do in math class today?" The student might well have found the hamburger problem fun and interesting, even though it seems silly and impractical. Aha! A good story to share with parents. Perhaps these problems are more likely to be intrinsically interesting than the chicken and rabbits problem.

Many middle school students do not know the circumference of the earth at its equator, and many do not know the distance from the earth to the moon. (Moreover, the distance from the earth to the moon varies, as the moon does not have an exactly circular orbit about the earth.)

This, the problem requires some research. Good! Also, the problem requires making an assumption about how to deal with the fact that the distance from the earth to the moon varies.

Notice also that the statement of the problem does not give data on the diameter or thickness of the HFFS hamburgers. It does not raise the issue that likely the HFFS sells a variety of sizes of hamburgers. Good! More data to be gathered or assumptions to be stated.

One of the things this problem illustrates is that to measure length, one needs a unit of measure. A foot is an interesting unit of measure—is it better than a hamburger as a unit of measure? If the problems are being solved by small teams of studetns, perhaps some teas will want to have a team member doing research on the history of units of measure. Such historical information could liven up the team's report to the class.

How do we know the diameter of the earth at the equator? Note that the equator passes over a lot of ocean, but it also passes over mountains. Does the length of the equator take into consideration going up and down mountains?

What is the distance from the earth to the moon? Does it vary with the choice of spot on the earth and spot on the moon? How does one measure the distance from the earth to the moon? Aha. Sound like indirect measurements to me.

One way we know the distance from the earth to the moon is by timing how long it takes a laser light beam to go from the earth to a reflector on the moon and bounce back to the earth. We measure the time, and make use of our knowledge of the speed of light. Is the speed of light in the earth's atmosphere the same as it is in a vacuum of "outer" space?

As you can see, the problem has a "fun feeling" but is very challenging. The problem can be done by individual students working alone or by teams of studetns.

Carbon Footprint

Quoting from the Wikipedia:

A carbon footprint is "the total set of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions caused directly and indirectly by an individual, organization, event or product". For simplicity of reporting, it is often expressed in terms of the amount of carbon dioxide, or its equivalent of other GHGs, emitted.

There are a variety of Carbon Footprint Calculators available on the Web. For example, The Nature Conservancy provides one to do a personal (individual) calculation and one for doing a household.

The following examples might well be used in a math and science problem-based unit of study.

Problem 1: Determine your personal carbon footprint and develop a feasible plan of how to reduce it by 10 to 15 percent.

Problem 2: Determine your household carbon footprint and develop a feasible plan of how it could be reduced by 10 to 15 percent.

Problem 3: Determine your school's carbon footprint and develop a feasible plan of how it could be reduced by by a significant amount. One approach to this problem would be to divide a class into teams of three to four students, and have each team work on the problem. After the team projects are completed, a whole class plan could be developed.

The overall idea of Carbon Footprint involves a lot of science and mathematics. Much of the input to a Carbon Footprint Calculator will consist of estimates. Moreover, the various methods for estimating a person's, households' or organization's carbon footprint will not produce identical answers.

This certainly is a real-world problem. The problem can be considered at a personal (individual) level, and each person is apt to come up with different approaches to decreasing his or her carbon footprint. Problem 3 can have individual groups producing quite different solutions, and may well generate competition among the teams.

The problem involves data gathering, where some of the data gathered or estimated may be much more accurate than others. This introduces the idea of an estimate or measurement falling in an interval. It introduces the idea of calculating a range of estimates for a carbon footprint, rather than a specific number.

The problem lends itself to developing and using a spreadsheet model to do the needed calculations. Thus, students can learn about math modeling of an important science problem.

Recommendations to Teachers of Math

Food for thought: Think about a parallel between a Language Arts teacher assigning giving an essay-writing assignment and a Mathematics teacher assigning a set of one or more word problems. In both cases, students are expected to "do" something. In both cases, the student has some knowledge, skills, and experience that can be used for self-assessment of the quality of work being done. In both cases, it is expected that summative assessment feedback (and perhaps formative assessment feedback) will be provided by others, such as other students, paper graders, and teachers.

It requires considerable knowledge and skill to provide good feedback on student writing. Moreover, this is a demanding, time consuming task. The paper reader must read for understanding, have good insight into the writing skills of students at a particular level, and know what constitutes good writing. The reader must have good writing pedagogical knowledge and skills.

The school math curriculum is very closely linked to and dependent on the textbooks and publisher-supplied teacher materials being used in the various math courses. To a very large extent, math teaching consists of "covering" a specified part of the textbook being used in a course.

This approach to math education has been used for a very long time, and is used throughout the world. To a large extent, the measure of the success of this approach is the measure of how well we are satisfied with the quality of math education that students are achieving.

Improving Math Education

Many people are not satisfied with the quality of math education students are achieving. This "problem" in math education can be attacked by doing more of the same. Thus, we work to develop better text books and teacher materials, educate teachers to be better in teaching via such books and materials, require students to take more math, make the school day and the school year longer, and so on.

It is very difficult to substantially modify this approach. Our math education system is huge, well established, and highly resistant to change. For many years, Michael Fullan has been a world leader in educational reform. Over the years his thinking has changed from focusing on the teacher as a unit of change to the school being a unit of change to the school district being a unit of change to the state or province being a unit of change to a whole country as being a unit of change.

Fullan's work can be considered as being supportive of current top down approaches being proposed and implemented in the United States. But, where does it leave the individual teacher. What can you, personally, be doing to improve the quality of math education your students are obtaining?

What You, Individually Can Do

This document argues that a teacher of math can improve the math education of his or her students by making more effective use of math word problems. Part of the improvement will come through changes in the individual teacher, and part will come through changes in the math word problems and their surrounding curriculum.

The changes suggested in this document include:

1. Place increased emphasis on math word problems—and, especially, on "good" math word problems. Learn to distinguish the good from the not so good, and significantly decrease use of the "not so good" word problems that are so prevalent in math textbooks and in other sources such as the Web.
2. Use math word problems as a vehicle (as an environment and climate) in which to help students gain in math maturity. Make math maturity one of the ideas you hold in mind as you prepare math lesson plans and teach math.
3. Cut down on the use of math word problems in drill and practice, rote memorization, and teaching to the test modes.
4. Use math word problems to increase the emphasis on math modeling, computer modeling, and other aspects of computational thinking in the math curriculum you teach.

References

FEMA (n.d.). Disaster math. Retrieved 10/4/09: http://www.fema.gov/kids/dizmath.htm.

Contains a small number of problems in each of the categories: earthquake, hurricane, tornado, wild fire, winter storm, and flood. These are presented in the form of questions with multiple choice answers. Multiple choice answers make it easy for the computer system to provide a very simple level of feedback. The computer system can indicated "correct" or "incorrect" for each question answered, and it can produce summary statistics such as, "you got 60 percent correct."

However, such feedback may be of little help to a student. Moreover, the real world does not consist of multiple choice problems.

Johnson, Mildred (1976). How to solve word problems in algebra: A solved problem approach. McGraw-Hill.

Math Playground (n.d.). Play with numbers and give your brain a workout. Retrieved 10/4/09: http://www.mathplayground.com/wordproblems.html. Quoting from the Website:

Learn how to solve multistep word problems with the challenging activities on this page. Many activities contain videos that explain the problem solving process step by step. There are word problems for students in grades 2 to 8.

MathStories,com (n.d.). House of math word problems for children. Retrieved 01/4/09: http://www.mathstories.com/. [This is a subscription service—not free.)

Quoting from the Website:

The goal of this math website is to help elementary school (Grade 1st through 6th) children boost their math problem solving and critical-thinking skills. MathStories.com has over 15,000 online and printable NCTM compliant math word problems for children to enjoy! Word problems are available in both English and Spanish. MathStories.com is the website for busy teachers, eager students, and involved parents.

Purplemath (n.d.). Translating word problems: Keywords. Retrieved 10/4/09: http://www.purplemath.com/modules/translat.htm. Quoting from the Website:

The hardest thing about doing word problems is taking the English words and translating them into mathematics. Usually, once you get the math equation, you're fine; the actual math involved is often fairly simple. But figuring out the actual equation can seem nearly impossible. What follows is a list of hints and helps. Be advised, however: To really learn "how to do" word problems, you will need to practice, practice, practice.

Reed, Stephen K. (1999). Word problems: Research and curriculum reform. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Syvum (n.d.). Kids math word problems. Retrieved 10/4/09: http://www.syvum.com/math/wordproblems/level1.html.

Several levels of material area available. For example, Level 1 is recommended for children ages 6–7 and requires use of 1 and 2 digit numbers.

Word Problems (n.d.). Word Problems: Numbers, consecutive odd/even, digits. Retrieved 10/4/09: http://www.algebra.com/algebra/homework/word/numbers/.

Author or Authors

Initial versions of this page were developed by Bob Albrecht and David Moursund. Others are encouraged to contribute.